We beleive a doctor should be under a duty of care to take reasonable steps to ensure that all patients are aware of any material risks involved in any recommended treatment. And also under a duty of care to advise of reasonable alternatives or variant treatments. The test of materiality is whether, in the circumstances of the particular case, a reasonable person, in the patient’s position, would be likely to attach significance to the risk, or whether the doctor is, or should be reasonably aware that the particular patient would be likely to attach significance to the risk.
Excepting to this ethical principle is New Zealand laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgeon operating under protection of the Health and Disability Commissioner
The goal of this site is to obtained justice and support for those suffering from Post cholecystectomy transient, persistent or lifelong and even chronic conditions with diagnosed treatment support
To ensure an end possible New Zealand largest patient affected medical malpractice frauds operating under the direct protection of the Health and Disability Commissioner